The Supreme Court additionally referred to that “the Ayalas and/or Zobels later ordered the subdivision of the hacienda, such as those excess areas, and offered the subdivided lots to 1/3 events.”
SSS’s petition
While Hacienda Bigaa misplaced its case of forcible entry in opposition to Chavez all the way to the excessive court, the SSS continues to be mired in what could be a long prison battle by going to the Supreme Court.
As keeper of the contributions of 34 million member-people and dispenser of the monthly pensions of retirees, SSS referred to as respondents Pasay City RTC Judge Gina Bibat-Palamos for her ruling against it, and the National Grid Corp. Of the Philippines (NGCP) for “expropriating” its assets.
Bibat-Palamos, SSS stated, now not only granted NGCP a “Writ of Possession” but even described its courtroom filing as “a trifling scrap of paper.”
There is a similarity inside the felony struggle waged via the SSS and Hacienda Bigaa, as each have been losers within the lower courts.
The large distinction lies in their respective petitions. The SSS wondered NGCP’s “expropriation” and valuation of its belongings. It additionally requested the high courtroom if, being a personal agency, NGCP has the proper to expropriate government belongings.
Hacienda Bigaa sued Chavez for forcible entry into its improved property and misplaced. In determining against it, high court ruled that the two,000-hectare enlargement of the hacienda became a part of public area.
SSS’s petition
While Hacienda Bigaa misplaced its case of forcible entry in opposition to Chavez all the way to the excessive court, the SSS continues to be mired in what could be a long prison battle by going to the Supreme Court.
As keeper of the contributions of 34 million member-people and dispenser of the monthly pensions of retirees, SSS referred to as respondents Pasay City RTC Judge Gina Bibat-Palamos for her ruling against it, and the National Grid Corp. Of the Philippines (NGCP) for “expropriating” its assets.
Bibat-Palamos, SSS stated, now not only granted NGCP a “Writ of Possession” but even described its courtroom filing as “a trifling scrap of paper.”
There is a similarity inside the felony struggle waged via the SSS and Hacienda Bigaa, as each have been losers within the lower courts.
The large distinction lies in their respective petitions. The SSS wondered NGCP’s “expropriation” and valuation of its belongings. It additionally requested the high courtroom if, being a personal agency, NGCP has the proper to expropriate government belongings.
Hacienda Bigaa sued Chavez for forcible entry into its improved property and misplaced. In determining against it, high court ruled that the two,000-hectare enlargement of the hacienda became a part of public area.
No comments:
Post a Comment